My Spline Learning Journey: From 403 Errors to Interactive 3D Scenes

spline 3d nextjs react webgl learning

A deep dive into integrating Spline 3D scenes into Next.js, covering the challenges, solutions, and lessons learned along the way.

My Spline Learning Journey: From 403 Errors to Interactive 3D Scenes

Introduction

When I first discovered Spline, I was immediately captivated by the idea of creating interactive 3D scenes directly in the browser. The promise of drag-and-drop 3D design that could be embedded into any React application seemed too good to be true. Spoiler alert: it wasn't, but the journey to get there was filled with more challenges than I initially anticipated.

In this post, I'll walk you through my complete learning journey with Spline, from the initial excitement to the frustrating 403 errors, through the debugging process, and finally to a working implementation. Whether you're just starting with Spline or hitting similar roadblocks, I hope this story helps you navigate your own 3D web development adventure.

The Initial Vision

What I Wanted to Build

I was browsing some GitHub repos when I stumbled upon Medusa, which is a digital commerce platform with a built-in framework for customization. I came across their homepage and saw a beautiful animation that I knew I had to learn how to recreate. I sat at their page mesmerized by how elegant this animation was, a floating 5-layer interactive UI stacked vertically representing 5 different layers of their framework. As you hover over each layer, the top layer would fade to an opaque state and reveal the next layer underneath. You can check out the animation yourself if you'd like.

This interactive layering effect was exactly what I wanted to build, but I needed to figure out the best way to implement it in a React application.

Why Spline?

I chose Spline for several reasons:

  • Visual Design: The ability to design 3D scenes visually rather than coding everything from scratch
  • React Integration: Native React components with @splinetool/react-spline
  • Performance: Optimized WebGL rendering out of the box
  • Ease of Use: Promised to be beginner-friendly for 3D development

The First Hurdle: Understanding the Export Options

URL vs Local File Confusion

One of my first challenges was understanding the different ways to integrate Spline scenes:

URL Method:

  • Export scene as React component
  • Get a public URL (e.g., https://prod.spline.design/.../scene.splinecode)
  • Load directly in React component
  • Pros: Simple, no file management
  • Cons: Requires public scene, dependent on Spline's servers

Local File Method:

  • Export as self-hosted .splinecode file
  • Host the file in your own public/ directory
  • Load from local file system
  • Pros: Full control, no external dependencies
  • Cons: Requires paid Spline plan, larger bundle size

The Decision Process

I initially wanted to try both methods to compare them, but quickly realized the local file approach required a paid subscription. This led me to focus on the URL method, which turned out to be the right choice for my use case.

The Debugging Nightmare

Error #1: 403 Forbidden

The first major roadblock was a 403 error when trying to load my scene. This taught me several important lessons:

// What I learned about Spline URLs
const splineUrl =
	"https://prod.spline.design/0tc5vcx8upINop77/scene.splinecode";
// ✅ Correct format
// ❌ https://my.spline.design/... (wrong subdomain)

Key Learnings:

  • Always use prod.spline.design for public scenes
  • Ensure your scene is set to "Public" in Spline
  • The URL format is very specific and case-sensitive

Error #2: "Data read, but end of buffer not reached"

This cryptic error was particularly frustrating because it provided no clear solution path. Through extensive debugging, I discovered:

  • The error often indicates a corrupted or invalid scene file
  • Sometimes it's a network issue where the file isn't fully downloaded
  • Re-exporting the scene from Spline usually fixes it

Error #3: Infinite Loading States

The most user-unfriendly issue was scenes that would load forever without any error feedback. This led me to implement:

// Loading timeout with user control
useEffect(() => {
	const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
		if (!isLoaded && !error) {
			setTimeoutReached(true);
			setError("Loading timeout - check URL and scene settings");
		}
	}, 8000); // 8 second timeout
 
	return () => clearTimeout(timeout);
}, [isLoaded, error]);

The Technical Deep Dive

Next.js Integration Challenges

Working with Spline in Next.js presented several unique challenges:

Client-Side Rendering Issues:

// ❌ This caused hydration errors
export default function SplineComponent() {
  return <Spline scene={url} />
}
 
// ✅ This works with proper client-side handling
'use client'
export default function SplineComponent() {
  const [isClient, setIsClient] = useState(false)
 
  useEffect(() => {
    setIsClient(true)
  }, [])
 
  if (!isClient) return <div>Loading...</div>
 
  return <Spline scene={url} />
}

Module Resolution Problems: The @splinetool/react-spline package had some export issues that required careful import handling:

// ❌ This caused module resolution errors
import Spline from "@splinetool/react-spline/next";
 
// ✅ This worked reliably
import Spline from "@splinetool/react-spline";

Building a Robust Component

Through trial and error, I developed a robust Spline component that handles all the edge cases:

export default function SplineBasic({ splineUrl }: SplineBasicProps) {
  const [isLoaded, setIsLoaded] = useState(false)
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)
  const [timeoutReached, setTimeoutReached] = useState(false)
  const [isClient, setIsClient] = useState(false)
 
  // Client-side rendering check
  useEffect(() => {
    setIsClient(true)
  }, [])
 
  // Loading timeout
  useEffect(() => {
    const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
      if (!isLoaded && !error) {
        setTimeoutReached(true)
        setError('Loading timeout - check URL and scene settings')
      }
    }, 8000)
 
    return () => clearTimeout(timeout)
  }, [isLoaded, error])
 
  const onLoad = (splineApp: any) => {
    setIsLoaded(true)
    setError(null)
    console.log('Spline scene loaded successfully!')
 
    // Test object detection
    if (splineApp && splineApp.findObjectByName) {
      const testObjects = ['Monitor', 'UI', 'Puzzle', 'Framework', 'Cloud']
      testObjects.forEach(name => {
        const obj = splineApp.findObjectByName(name)
        console.log(`Object "${name}":`, obj ? 'Found' : 'Not found')
      })
    }
  }
 
  const onError = (error: any) => {
    console.error('Spline loading error:', error)
    let errorMessage = 'Failed to load scene'
 
    if (error.message && error.message.includes('Unexpected token')) {
      errorMessage = 'Invalid scene format - check URL and scene settings'
    } else if (error.message) {
      errorMessage = `Failed to load scene: ${error.message}`
    }
 
    setError(errorMessage)
  }
 
  // Rest of component...
}

The Animation Challenge

Understanding Spline's Animation System

One of the most complex parts was figuring out how to control Spline animations from React:

Spline Actions vs Direct Object Manipulation:

  • Spline Actions: Built-in system for scene interactions
  • Direct Manipulation: Accessing objects via findObjectByName() and modifying properties

The OverlayViel Problem: My original vision required hiding the opacity layer initially, but Spline's free Actions don't include a "Hide Object" action. This led to a fundamental decision:

  1. Use Spline Actions (limited but integrated)
  2. Use direct object manipulation (more control but more complex)

The Viewport Interaction Approach

I experimented with direct viewport interaction using Spline's native event system:

// Setting up hover events directly in Spline viewport
layer.addEventListener("mouseHover", () => {
	console.log(`Hovered over ${layerName} in viewport`);
	handleLayerHover(index);
});
 
layer.addEventListener("mouseLeave", () => {
	console.log(`Left ${layerName} in viewport`);
	handleLayerLeave();
});

This approach worked but required careful coordination between Spline's event system and React's state management.

Lessons Learned

What Worked Well

  1. Step-by-Step Approach: Starting with basic rendering before adding complex features
  2. Comprehensive Error Handling: Timeouts, user feedback, and detailed error messages
  3. Debugging Tools: URL testing component to verify scene accessibility
  4. Client-Side Rendering: Proper handling of Next.js SSR requirements

What Was Challenging

  1. Documentation Gaps: Limited examples for complex integration scenarios
  2. Error Messages: Cryptic errors that didn't provide clear solutions
  3. Animation Control: Limited options for fine-grained animation control
  4. State Management: Coordinating between Spline's internal state and React state

Key Insights

  1. Start Simple: Get basic rendering working before adding animations
  2. Plan for Errors: Users will hit the same issues you do
  3. Test Thoroughly: Different browsers and devices can behave differently
  4. Document Everything: You'll forget the solutions to problems you've already solved

The Reality Check: Spline's Limitations

Discovering the Truth Too Late

One of the most frustrating aspects of this entire journey was that I didn't realize the fundamental limitations of Spline until I was deep into the implementation process. After spending hours debugging, building components, and trying different approaches, I finally discovered the hard truths about what Spline could and couldn't deliver.

Premium Requirements for Full Control

One important realization I had during this journey is that to truly recreate the same effect and animation quality that Medusa achieved, you would need to pay for Spline's premium plan to get access to the actual object files. This gives you full granular control over every aspect of the 3D scene.

The Viewport Constraint

The biggest limitation I discovered is that Spline only allows you to interact through their own viewport system. You can't add any interactivity outside of that viewport, which significantly limits the creative possibilities. This was particularly frustrating when trying to create seamless integrations with the rest of my React application.

A Silver Lining: Learning 3D Modeling

Despite these limitations, the whole Spline experience was incredibly valuable for my development journey. I was getting a bit burnt out from traditional coding, and diving into 3D modeling through Spline's visual interface gave me a fresh perspective and helped me gain a better understanding of 3D concepts. It was a nice break from the usual coding routine while still being productive and learning new skills.

The 3D Modeling Journey

Before jumping into Spline, I checked the documentation and went through some tutorials they had. I think the most important thing to get familiar with is the UI and how to move around the 3D space, which I learned quickly after a few videos. Next was creating basic shapes, then transforming them to have extrusions to make 3D space. In that process, I found how to create corners or bevels on shapes or even go into even more detail by adding bevels to individual indices on an object. I spent a few hours making the first layer of my animation and had so much fun creating in 3D space.

Another feature I soon discovered was their boolean operations, which allow you to union, subtract, or intersect objects. This allowed me to make the hardest 3D model of the whole project: the puzzle pieces.

Overall, there are many great resources to follow along with in their official documentation and on YouTube, which all made illustrating anything easy and the only limitation was your imagination!

The Final Result

After all the debugging, learning, and 3D modeling, here's what I was able to create:

Live Spline Scene

Here's the actual interactive 3D scene embedded directly in this blog post:

Loading 3D scene...

Working React Component

Here's the final working component that successfully loads the Spline scene:

import Spline from '@splinetool/react-spline/next';
 
export default function Home() {
  return (
    <main>
      <Spline
        scene="https://prod.spline.design/0tc5vcx8upINop77/scene.splinecode" 
      />
    </main>
  );
}

What the Scene Contains

The scene features a multi-layered 3D interface with:

  • Monitor Layer: The top layer representing the user interface
  • UI Components: Various interactive elements
  • Puzzle Pieces: Complex 3D models created using boolean operations
  • Framework Elements: Representing the underlying system architecture
  • Cloud Elements: Background components for visual depth

While it doesn't achieve the exact Medusa-style layering effect I originally envisioned (due to Spline's limitations), it demonstrates the 3D modeling skills I developed and serves as a working example of Spline integration in React.

The Current State

What's Working

  • ✅ Spline scenes load reliably from URLs
  • ✅ Proper error handling and user feedback
  • ✅ Clean, maintainable component structure
  • ✅ Next.js integration without hydration issues

What's Next

  • 🔄 Layer-by-layer opacity animations
  • 🔄 More sophisticated interaction patterns
  • 🔄 Performance optimization for complex scenes
  • 🔄 Mobile responsiveness improvements

Code Examples and Resources

Essential Spline Component

'use client'
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react'
import Spline from '@splinetool/react-spline'
 
interface SplineBasicProps {
  splineUrl: string
}
 
export default function SplineBasic({ splineUrl }: SplineBasicProps) {
  // Component implementation as shown above
}

Debugging URL Component

export default function UrlTest({ url }: { url: string }) {
  const [response, setResponse] = useState<string>('')
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false)
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)
 
  const testUrl = async () => {
    setLoading(true)
    setError(null)
 
    try {
      const res = await fetch(url)
      const text = await res.text()
      setResponse(text.substring(0, 500) + '...')
    } catch (err) {
      setError(err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'Unknown error')
    } finally {
      setLoading(false)
    }
  }
 
  return (
    <div className="bg-slate-800 p-4 rounded-lg">
      <button onClick={testUrl} disabled={loading}>
        {loading ? 'Testing...' : 'Test URL'}
      </button>
      {error && <div className="text-red-400 mt-2">Error: {error}</div>}
      {response && <pre className="text-xs mt-2">{response}</pre>}
    </div>
  )
}

Conclusion

My Spline learning journey was filled with both excitement and frustration, but ultimately it was incredibly rewarding. The key was persistence, systematic debugging, and not being afraid to simplify when things got too complex.

The most important lesson I learned is that 3D web development, even with tools as powerful as Spline, still requires a solid understanding of the underlying technologies. Spline makes it easier, but it doesn't eliminate the need for proper error handling, state management, and performance considerations.

If you're starting your own Spline journey, I'd recommend:

  1. Start with the basics - get a simple scene rendering first
  2. Build robust error handling from the beginning
  3. Don't be afraid to simplify your initial vision
  4. Document everything as you learn
  5. Be patient with the debugging process

The 3D web is an exciting frontier, and tools like Spline are making it more accessible than ever. With the right approach and persistence, you can create amazing interactive experiences that were impossible just a few years ago.

Have you worked with Spline or other 3D web tools? I'd love to hear about your experiences and any tips you've discovered along the way. Feel free to reach out on Twitter or GitHub!

Comments

Have thoughts on this post? Join the discussion below!